(**CONTAINS SPOILERS FOR BOTH THE TV SERIES & THE ORIGINAL BOOKS**)
The sixth and final season of "The Handmaid's Tale" reached its conclusion earlier this week. I've spent a lot of time since then browsing related posts and comments on social media (I'm clearly a glutton for punishment! lol) -- and I have some thoughts...!
- Several of my predictions for the last few episodes of the season were right!
- ...But not all of them. The finale was much lower-key than I had anticipated, and a lot more people survived than I anticipated. Which is not a bad thing (especially if you're trying to make viewers happy!), if not entirely realistic.
- Janine not only being freed but also getting Charlotte/Angela back was one of those things I didn't think was entirely realistic, particularly in the way it unfolded (so abrupt, no explanation??) -- but it certainly made people happy. As many commenters said, if anyone in the series deserved a happy ending, it was Janine!
- I saw Alexis Bledel (Emily) listed in the credits for this episode in advance, but I thought she would show up in a flashback. So I was genuinely and pleasantly surprised when she actually did show up!
- A lot of commenters felt Serena Joy got off lightly, and many were not happy that June forgave her. There were also a lot of predictions of a future romance with Mark Tuello, the American rebellion leader (!).
- While I loved Aunt Lydia's rant from the scaffold in episode 9 -- and it clearly shows her evolving into the person she becomes in "The Testaments" -- I'm not entirely clear how she'll get away with that and still maintain a powerful position in Gilead (as depicted in the book, anyway)?
- A LOT of fans were LIVID that Nick got killed off at the end of episode 9!! I saw more than one wishful suggestion that Nick (and sometimes Commander Lawrence) somehow survived the explosion -- he parachuted out of the plane!! Or it was all a dream!! (a la Pam Ewing and Bobby in the shower on "Dallas," many moons ago, lol).
- Many saw Nick as a romantic hero and felt he'd been unfairly portrayed in the final season.
- Others pointed out that Nick/Nicole's father is part of "The Testaments" (albeit just a small part), so how could they kill him off? (I would say that's Hollywood/showbiz...!)
- Personally, I always thought of Nick as an ambiguous character. His allegiances in the first book are unclear -- when he nods to June at the very end of "The Handmaid's Tale" (the book -- also the ending of the first season of the TV show), indicating she should get into the van, she doesn't know whether the van is taking her to freedom or to punishment. In the second book, we don't hear much about him, only that he is indeed with Mayday -- but his role is not quite so clear in the TV series. He does co-operate with Mayday, and what's left of the American government, but seems increasingly reluctant to do so, and (with a wife, a powerful father-in-law, and a baby on the way) increasingly enmeshed in the life and leadership of Gilead.
- Some pointed out that he had plenty of opportunities to escape Gilead (having helped June go back and forth across the border multiple times) and join June and their daughter in Canada or in Alaska -- but he remained in Gilead.
- Some people were mad that June didn't wind up with Luke either (!), and the ambiguous nature of their parting. I didn't get the feeling that they were splitting for good, more like they were taking a break while they continued their work with the resistance (and continued the search for Hannah). However their marriage evolves, they seemed to be in a good place as friends and co-parents, which was nice to see.
- Of course, it's "The HANDMAID's Tale" -- it's not "Twilight" or "The Hunger Games" (Team Luke or Team Nick), as one disgruntled commenter put it (lol). The book and the show are not about romance and not about the men. Essentially, both are about women -- one woman in particular -- and their fight to survive in a brutal patriarchal system.
- The takeaway message, I think, came in a conversation June had with her mother, Holly, midway through the finale, explaining her decision to leave her daughter (again) and continue the fight:
“But the thing is, mom, I’m not safe. And neither are you. And they’re never going to stop coming for us. And even when we’re gone, they are going to come for our children…and our grandchildren. Fighting might not get us everything, but we don’t have a choice. Because not fighting is what got us Gilead in the first place. And Gilead doesn’t need to be beaten — it needs to be broken.”
(Anyone paying attention??)
- I was bemused by the number of people insisting that, in "The Testaments" (the book), Nicole and Hannah are reunited, not only with their mother but with their fathers (and therefore Nick should not have been killed off).
- Okay, it's been a while (almost 6 years!) since I read the book, but I had absolutely NO memory of the fathers showing up. I don't have time to re-read that book right now, and I gave my paper copy to the thrift store, but I did a search of my e-book for the word "father" -- and while there are references to both girls' fathers, I found no father-daughter reunion scenes.
- I commented to that effect on a few social media comments -- and got thoroughly taken to task. Which reminded me why I usually don't comment on public posts...!
- Several people pointed me to a dedication ceremony at the very end of the book as evidence of a reunion. I went back to my ebook and looked it up, and yes, the sisters' mother AND fathers are mentioned in the wording of a plaque, which is cited by the speaker at a symposium, years into the future, as evidence that the two girls were reunited with their parents (and also went on to have children and grandchildren). But unlike their mother, the fathers never actually make an appearance in the story. (I did NOT go back to argue that point, though!)
- Many people were upset that there was no June-Hannah reunion (which would have been the traditional Hollywood happy ending, of course). I saw several comments along the lines of "Wasn't getting Hannah back the whole point of the show??: Others begged for a season 7, with a mother-daughter reunion.
- They obviously haven't read the books or any of the publicity about the upcoming sequel series, "The Testaments" (no one who has was expecting a reunion) -- in fact, many admitted they had no idea there's a sequel book, or a sequel show in the works.
- I mean, I know I'm retired, I have more free time to read & follow things than some people do -- but you're a fan of the show!! you're on social media!! -- how can you not know??
- Also, Gilead being Gilead, you had to know that happy endings are far and few between...! and that some questions will never have answers...
- A lot of people were also demanding to know what happened to Esther (played by Mckenna Grace -- not a character from the novel), last seen at the end of season 5, pregnant and shackled to a hospital bed. She did not reappear this season.
- I noticed a LOT of references to mothers, children and the maternal relationship, in the finale -- and in the series generally.
- I wasn't the only one who noticed! I got a chuckle out of this review from Den of Geek. The header reads (in part): "This show grants itself a valedictory tour built around a heavily insisted-upon message that the children are our future." Relevant excerpt:
Nothing in the finale mattered so much as its heavily insisted-upon message, which was all about parents fighting to create a better world to keep their children safe. June readied herself to leave little Holly again, bolstered by Emily’s assurance that it didn’t mean she was abandoning her family. Luke planned to reach Hannah by liberating one state from Gilead at a time. Naomi Lawrence returned little Charlotte to her mother to keep her out of a warzone. Even Mark Tuello was conjured up an off-screen son to motivate his military moves.
By the time Holly Sr had declaimed over not being able to keep June safe, and Serena had promised to dedicate herself solely to the raising of her precious baby Noah, it was hard not to feel a little Gilead propaganda going on in terms of children being the only reason that anybody does anything. I don’t recall that being the point Margaret Atwood was making back in 1985.
[Note from Loribeth: Touchez!]
- I wasn't sure why June returned to the Waterfords' house (what was left of it) at the end... I thought that perhaps, when she went into her old room, she'd look in the closet and see "Nolite te bastardes carborundorum" (the ersatz-Latin phrase for "Don't let the bastards grind you down"), carved in the wall by the Waterfords' original Handmaid (who killed herself).
- She did not do that.
- But it all made sense when she pulled out a tape recorder (although, really, she just happened to have one in her bag??) and started speaking the words that open Margaret Atwood's original novel. (Both her mother & Luke encouraged her, in previous scenes, to write a book about her experiences in Gilead.)
- Several people pointed out that the first episode of season one ends with June speaking the same words in voiceover... and that you can actually hear the "click" of the tape recorder being turned on. (Elisabeth Moss, who plays June, says she went back to that episode to make sure she matched the tone and pace of that speech as closely as possible for the finale.) Which brings the series full circle, and also brings it back to the novel. Perfect.
- June/The Handmaid's first words in the book (the beginning of the speech which ends the show): "A chair. A table. A lamp." But did anyone notice that Serena's final (or near-final?) words in the show echo this? "A chair, a table, a bed -- that's all you need, I guess." (And her son, of course...!)